The best review is a bad review. Example A - Scott McLemee's review of Cornel West's Brother West: Living and Loving Out Loud, A Memoir.
Legend has it that the blues guitarist Robert Johnson acquired his haunting style by selling his soul to the devil at a crossroads. West, as a “bluesman of the life of the mind,” has clearly also been to the crossroads. The devil gave him a team of publicists. I don't think this was a good bargain on West's part. It left him unable to recognize that self-respect is often the enemy of self-esteem.
[Snickering sounds.]

My favorite bad review of all time is probably Ian Sansom's review of John Fowles' Journals. But I'd love to know other people's favorites.
Posted by: Ben Brumfield | December 02, 2009 at 11:22 AM
I intended to title my review of a David Foster Wallace book of essays, "A Supposedly Good Author I Will Never Read Again." Unfortunately, I found the title rendered the review superfluous. (Rather like Daniel Davies and "Being Freakonomical With the Truth".)
This led Teresa Nielsen Hayden to say, "O, that is wonderful, I am slain."
Posted by: Doug | December 02, 2009 at 12:59 PM
Thanks for the pointer, BB. The review explains rather a lot about The Magus, except why people insist on liking it. Best line from Sansom, "They tidy up, your mum and dad."
Posted by: Doug | December 02, 2009 at 01:11 PM
West's comments on marriage made me chortle. Aren't we going to pillory him, the way we did Sandra Tsing Loh?
Posted by: Marya | December 02, 2009 at 10:46 PM
I think we'd have to take West's comments more seriously than we take STL's to pillory him.
Posted by: Ben Brumfield | December 03, 2009 at 11:02 AM
I haven't read it, but I'm guessing that this is going to make STL seem reasonable.
Posted by: MH | December 03, 2009 at 11:08 AM