Just about every embittered former academic I know is linking to this article in Inside Higher Ed. It's a must-read.
How did I miss the sexy Miss USA picture scandal? I look forward to viewing the French Maid portion of the contest.
Really interesting article about how all the tech geeks are moving to Boulder, CO for the lifestyle.
Henry Farrell deleted his Facebook account. Read why.

440.
Posted by: MH | May 14, 2010 at 06:05 PM
What? Are they getting rid of the evening gown contest? for real? Isn't the viewership of beauty contests largely female?
Posted by: bj | May 14, 2010 at 08:50 PM
I've been reading a bunch of Facebook-hating stuff lately. I've had signing up for FB on my to-do list for some time, and it's nice to have an excuse to wait, even though I feel like there are some good things I've been missing out on. On the other hand, privacy is nice, too, and on the internet, once you lose it, you can't get it back.
Posted by: Amy P | May 14, 2010 at 09:21 PM
I'm thisclose to deleting my Facebook account, too.
The trouble is, back when I had control of the information I posted there, it served a really good function. I want a space to reconnect with distant friends and relatives.
I'm just not willing to sell my biography, interests, and connections to fund the site.
This is all about funding, I suppose. Facebook can't get paying advertisers without mining the data. But they can't really offer a fee-based private site now, not when they used to be private for free.
Posted by: Jody | May 15, 2010 at 09:16 AM
Some embittered tenured professors find it pretty compelling, too. Especailly those of us who spend lots of time doing those adjuncty things.
Posted by: RCinProv | May 15, 2010 at 12:07 PM
Sara and I skimmed the comment thread on Megan McArdle's excellent academic workforce post yesterday and started coming up with a list of tournament systems to steer young people away from.
The list so far:
Any others?
Posted by: Ben Brumfield | May 18, 2010 at 01:02 PM
I don't think we want to steer young people away from tournament systems. For those not well connected and not overly systematic in their thinking, it is one of the few ways to get ahead. I just think that you should be able to multiple the odds of "winning" by the value of the "prize" and be able to hit something like $15,000* per year it took to get a ticket.
*Not a firm number.
Posted by: MH | May 18, 2010 at 01:40 PM
MH, do you think that any of the fields I listed pass your formula? In particular, game development (as detailed by one of Megan's commenters) doesn't seem to require a ticket more expensive than the opportunity costs. However, those opportunity costs may be massive for someone who could be working at a professional level at a software job.
Posted by: Ben Brumfield | May 18, 2010 at 03:38 PM
MH, do you think that any of the fields I listed pass your formula?
I'm sure some of them do, for some people. For example, I just now learned that DEVO is still touring. Even a relatively low $10 million dollar payout could justify spending a few years for a 2 or 3 percent chance of success. (I'm not actually going to do the math properly by using a discount rate.)
Posted by: MH | May 18, 2010 at 03:44 PM